Ken posted an update here – http://www.linkingmatters.com/2005/06/ftcom-replies-chris-osborne-head-of.html about the story I cited from him a couple of days ago.
Apparently it was some sort of “accident”. Sure. If it were legitimately supposed to be there wouldn’t it at least match the positioning of the other visible links? I dunno. Anyhow I guess the hard part is to determine who did what. I’m sure it was not an upper-level type of thing…